If you're a teacher or perhaps a parent you've likely noticed this question before. Perhaps frequently! "Why should I discover that? " I've been thinking a great deal about how to solution that question. But, it occurs to me that it's also important to take a look at what is motivating the actual student to ask the question to begin with. Sometimes, it is an authentic curiosity about why this specific subject is being trained. At other times I believe it indicates deficiencies in interest in the subject that happen to be due to the way it is being trained. I've concluded that in some instances students simply find my presentation from the subject boring and unengaged. However, in any case the question deserves a significant thoughtful answer.
It should go without saying that among the worst answers to the actual question
is: Because it will likely be on the exam. If this is actually the best
justification you can offer for learning any topic then that subject isn't any
longer worth learning. It is simply inadequate to say that the key reason we
need to learn anything is really that we can move an exam.
It is also inadequate to say that we have to learn something because it happens to be taught in the previous. Or because it can help you pass a class and obtain a degree. These are empty vacuous answers.
I believe the only sufficient response to the "Why Should We Learn That? " question is the one that shows the importance associated with learning that subject within and of itself. The solution should also illustrate what skills you can expect to master by learning individual and what you might do together.
Often students will ask the question inside a slightly different way: Exactly why is this relevant? Educators and parents are then tempted to exhibit the relevance of individual to the student's instant concerns. The problem with this method is that it can result in a dismissal of a subject that happen to be worth learning for additional reasons.
Some subjects which don't appear immediately relevant are nevertheless worth learning because they might be useful at some point later on. In cases where all of us can't answer the "relevance" query with immediate examples we start to use an answer that shows benefit of the subject due to the usefulness of the skills it teaches and also the likely future relevance.
The easy fact about relevance that's often overlooked is that people can't fully know now what may be relevant in our long term. How could I have known in senior high school that I would wind up teaching philosophy online? My interest then what food was in studying medical technology and there is no internet. So, any kind of study of philosophy, background, or computers might possess seemed irrelevant to me at that time.
So, learn as much as possible even if it appears irrelevant. Perhaps especially if it appears irrelevant. You never understand how important that knowledge may be.
It is also inadequate to say that we have to learn something because it happens to be taught in the previous. Or because it can help you pass a class and obtain a degree. These are empty vacuous answers.
I believe the only sufficient response to the "Why Should We Learn That? " question is the one that shows the importance associated with learning that subject within and of itself. The solution should also illustrate what skills you can expect to master by learning individual and what you might do together.
Often students will ask the question inside a slightly different way: Exactly why is this relevant? Educators and parents are then tempted to exhibit the relevance of individual to the student's instant concerns. The problem with this method is that it can result in a dismissal of a subject that happen to be worth learning for additional reasons.
Some subjects which don't appear immediately relevant are nevertheless worth learning because they might be useful at some point later on. In cases where all of us can't answer the "relevance" query with immediate examples we start to use an answer that shows benefit of the subject due to the usefulness of the skills it teaches and also the likely future relevance.
The easy fact about relevance that's often overlooked is that people can't fully know now what may be relevant in our long term. How could I have known in senior high school that I would wind up teaching philosophy online? My interest then what food was in studying medical technology and there is no internet. So, any kind of study of philosophy, background, or computers might possess seemed irrelevant to me at that time.
So, learn as much as possible even if it appears irrelevant. Perhaps especially if it appears irrelevant. You never understand how important that knowledge may be.
You can choose any college &
university from below link
USA Online College and university
http://www.bestvalueschools.com/affordable-online-colleges-2014/
http://www.affordablecollegesonline.org/best-colleges-online/
http://www.onlineu.org/most-affordable-colleges
http://ope.ed.gov/accreditation/
http://www.guidetoonlineschools.com/online-schools
http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-universities
http://www.thebestschools.org/rankings/30-best-online-colleges-2014/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_online_colleges_in_the_United_States
USA College and university
http://www.50states.com/college/#.VMDp6SzSXIU
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lists_of_American_institutions_of_higher_education
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Lists_of_universities_and_colleges_in_the_United_States
U k College and university
http://www.4icu.org/gb/uk-universities.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_UK_universities_by_endowment
http://www.studyabroaduk.co.uk/uk-colleges-list/
http://senatehouselibrary.ac.uk/
https://www.gov.uk/check-a-university-is-officially-recognised/listed-bodies
U k Online College and university
http://www.learn4good.com/distance_learn/distance_learn_uk.htm
